Compare
A different starting point: evidence, not price.
Most prediction-market tooling starts from market data - prices, volume, sentiment. MarketClaims starts from the world: what has actually been reported, by whom, and how it bears on resolution. Here is how the approaches differ.
Primary input
Typical tooling: Market prices, order flow, and social sentiment
MarketClaims: News coverage in 20+ languages, distilled into sourced claims
Output
Typical tooling: Signals, scores, or trade ideas
MarketClaims: A research report: claims, sources, confidence, resolution risks
Verifiability
Typical tooling: Methodology often opaque
MarketClaims: Every claim links to its source; every lean is graded post-resolution
When evidence is thin
Typical tooling: A signal is usually produced anyway
MarketClaims: The verdict can be “insufficient evidence” - and often is
Trading integration
Typical tooling: Wallet or exchange connections common
MarketClaims: None, by design. No trades, no funds, no wallets
Track record
Typical tooling: Self-reported highlights
MarketClaims: Timestamped calls graded against outcomes - hits and misses both
This compares categories of approach, not specific products. Many tools in this space are excellent at what they do; ours is sourced evidence. Evaluate any research tool — including this one - by its published track record.
Judge us by the receipts.
Every call we make is timestamped, sourced, and graded.
See how the track record worksResearch only. Not financial advice.
Compare it against a market you know.
The fastest way to judge the difference is to run one. Ten free investigations, no card required.
Ten free investigations. No card required. Research only — not financial advice.