Compare
A different starting point: evidence, not price.
Most prediction-market tooling starts from market data - prices, volume, sentiment. MarketClaims starts from the world: what has actually been reported, by whom, and how it bears on resolution. Here is how the approaches differ.
Primary input
Typical tooling: Market prices, order flow, and social sentiment
MarketClaims: News coverage in 20+ languages, distilled into sourced claims
Output
Typical tooling: Signals, scores, or trade ideas
MarketClaims: A research report: claims, sources, confidence, resolution risks
Verifiability
Typical tooling: Methodology often opaque
MarketClaims: Every claim links to its source; every lean is graded post-resolution
When evidence is thin
Typical tooling: A signal is usually produced anyway
MarketClaims: The verdict can be “insufficient evidence” - and often is
Trading integration
Typical tooling: Wallet or exchange connections common
MarketClaims: None, by design. No trades, no funds, no wallets
Track record
Typical tooling: Self-reported highlights
MarketClaims: Timestamped calls graded against outcomes - hits and misses both
This compares categories of approach, not specific products. Many tools in this space are excellent at what they do; ours is sourced evidence. Evaluate any research tool — including this one - by its published track record.
Judge us by the receipts.
Every call we make is timestamped, sourced, and graded.
See how the track record worksResearch only. Not financial advice.